On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 7:30 PM Pamela Chestek <pam...@chesteklegal.com> wrote: > > You would be assuming wrong. UIRC-GSA Holdings Inc. v. William Blair & Co., > L.L.C., No. 15-CV-9518, 2017 WL 1163864, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 29, 2017) > (bond offering documents copyrightable); Homeowner Options for Mass. Elders, > Inc. v. Brookline Bancorp, Inc., 754 F. Supp. 2d 201, 209 (D. Mass. 2010) > (mortgage forms copyrightable); Phoenix Renovation Corp. v. Rodriguez, 439 F. > Supp. 2d 510, 516–17 (E.D. Va. 2006) (customer contract copyrightable); Am. > Family Life Ins. Co. of Columbus v. Assurant, Inc., No. 1:05-CV-1462-BBM, > 2006 WL 4017651, at *6–8 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 11, 2006) (insurance policies > copyrightable). To those of us who write them, they are as creative as code. > > Pam
And some brilliant lawyers even create/store their licenses in git, and specify a license as well. In this case CC0: https://github.com/copyleft-next/copyleft-next/blob/master/CC0 HTH James PS: Cheap plug: teaching lawyers git skills: https://github.com/purpleidea/legal-hackers _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
