See the few references I added in response to your first message. I believe the ultimate source n the US is the 1976 act + CONTU recommendations that were enacted into law, but I would have to double check. Note that one of the references is a WIPO publication, referring to international law.
Thanks, Van On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 7:40 PM Bruce Perens <br...@perens.com> wrote: > > *First, would you please discuss whether there is a sufficient public > performance right for software defined in 17 USC 106 (4), (5) and (6)? I > read your discussion of Public Performance and was not enlightened.* > > The problem I'm having with this is that you tossed out "software is > defined as a literary work" without explanation. Where? By Nimmer, or the > Supreme Court? With existing case law of the use of public performance > rights for software? > > Thanks > > Bruce > >> _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@lists.opensource.org > > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org >
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
