> *First, would you please discuss whether there is a sufficient public
performance right for software defined in 17 USC 106 (4), (5) and (6)? I
read your discussion of Public Performance and was not enlightened.*
The problem I'm having with this is that you tossed out "software is
defined as a literary work" without explanation. Where? By Nimmer, or the
Supreme Court? With existing case law of the use of public performance
rights for software?
Thanks
Bruce
>
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
