URL:
  <https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?111195>

                 Summary: Include libtool-next-version in the libtool
distribution
                   Group: GNU Libtool
               Submitter: haible
               Submitted: Di 25 Feb 2025 10:38:51 CET
                Category: None
                Priority: 5 - Normal
                Severity: 3 - Normal
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
        Originator Email:
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
        Operating System: None


    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comments:


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Di 25 Feb 2025 10:38:51 CET    By: Bruno Haible <haible>
As maintainer of a package that ships a shared library, it is easy to make
mistakes when assigning a new libtool version triplet, while making a release.
(Doc node "Updating version info".)

To make this process more reliable, there is a program
gnulib/build-aux/libtool-next-version that improves this process
1) by asking the maintainer questions, so that they can focus on one thing at
a time,
2) by giving additional help to the maintainer (for example, by explaining
what constitutes an "interface" of the shared library),
3) by preparing default answers based on the set of symbols exported by the
shared library.

I am using this script for the GNU gettext and GNU libunistring releases of
the last 5 years, and it has avoid a mistake more than once.

Can we move this script to the libtool project, so that it would be
distributed as $(prefix)/bin/libtool-next-version ? Also, it would be nice if
the doc node "Updating version info" would reference this script.







    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?111195>

_______________________________________________
Nachricht gesendet über Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to