* Mike Frysinger wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:31:22PM CET: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2003-06/msg00023.html
Ugh. Well, yes, that's what I feared: that this thing would be a lot more complicated than apparent at first. The above has certainly seen more testing than my simplistic patch, which has seen none so far. :-) The patch in that URL doesn't seem to treat -pthread on GNU/Linux specially; it should be checked whether that is sufficient (esp. for C++). Using --allow-shlib-undefined might help some of the issues. I do wonder a bit why they invented a new libtool config variable name for this in the patch. If you want to forward port it and test it as outlined, be our guest. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
