libtool  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: How does one specify linking to 64 bit libraries when there is a choice? Bruce Korb
• PIC flags not found for mpif77(ifort) Christian Rössel
  • Re: PIC flags not found for mpif77(ifort) Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: PIC flags not found for mpif77(ifort) Christian Rössel
  • Re: PIC flags not found for mpif77(ifort) Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: PIC flags not found for mpif77(ifort) Christian Rössel
  • Re: PIC flags not found for mpif77(ifort) Christian Rössel
  • Re: PIC flags not found for mpif77(ifort) Christian Rössel
• ld: fatal: file .libs/libglib-2.0.exp: unknown file type Laviticus Stone
  • Re: ld: fatal: file .libs/libglib-2.0.exp: unknown file type Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: ld: fatal: file .libs/libglib-2.0.exp: unknown file type Laviticus Stone
  • Re: ld: fatal: file .libs/libglib-2.0.exp: unknown file type Laviticus Stone
  • Re: ld: fatal: file .libs/libglib-2.0.exp: unknown file type Laviticus Stone
  • Re: ld: fatal: file .libs/libglib-2.0.exp: unknown file type Ralf Wildenhues
• Problem with libtool adding -pthread John R. Cary
  • Re: Problem with libtool adding -pthread John R. Cary
  • Re: Problem with libtool adding -pthread Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: Problem with libtool adding -pthread John R. Cary
  • Re: Problem with libtool adding -pthread Christopher Hulbert
• Enhanced OS/2 port KO Myung-Hun
  • Re: Enhanced OS/2 port KO Myung-Hun
  • Re: Enhanced OS/2 port Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: Enhanced OS/2 port KO Myung-Hun
  • Re: Enhanced OS/2 port KO Myung-Hun
  • Re: Enhanced OS/2 port KO Myung-Hun
  • Re: Enhanced OS/2 port Ralf Wildenhues
• g++ library problem Norton Allen
• Problem with --as-needed flag Sergio Belkin
  • Re: Problem with --as-needed flag Mike Frysinger
  • Re: Problem with --as-needed flag Sergio Belkin
  • Re: Problem with --as-needed flag Dan Nicholson
  • Re: Problem with --as-needed flag Sergio Belkin
• libtool doesn't process LD_FLAGS arguments properly Gavrilov, Roman
  • Re: libtool doesn't process LD_FLAGS arguments properly Gary V. Vaughan
  • RE: libtool doesn't process LD_FLAGS arguments properly Gavrilov, Roman
  • Re: libtool doesn't process LD_FLAGS arguments properly Gary V. Vaughan
• Re: adding conditionally a c++ file implies static linking with g++ Vincent Torri
  • Re: adding conditionally a c++ file implies static linking with g++ Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: adding conditionally a c++ file implies static linking with g++ Vincent Torri
• Libtool can't find libgcc_s ethan . mallove
  • Re: Libtool can't find libgcc_s Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: Libtool can't find libgcc_s Ethan Mallove
  • Re: Libtool can't find libgcc_s Ralf Wildenhues
• Problem with deplibs Bruno Barberi Gnecco
  • Re: Problem with deplibs Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: Problem with deplibs Bruno Barberi Gnecco
  • Re: Problem with deplibs Anssi Hannula
• How to create only target shared library at place not ending in rpath? Vitaly V. Ch
  • Re: How to create only target shared library at place not ending in rpath? Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: How to create only target shared library at place not ending in rpath? Vitaly V. Ch
  • Re: How to create only target shared library at place not ending in rpath? Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: How to create only target shared library at place not ending in rpath? Vitaly V. Ch
• DLL creation and static libs Matěj Týč
  • Re: DLL creation and static libs Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: DLL creation and static libs Charles Wilson
  • Re: DLL creation and static libs Matěj Týč
  • Re: DLL creation and static libs Charles Wilson
• Re: How does libtool decide which so to link against? Mike Frysinger
  • Re: How does libtool decide which so to link against? dherring
  • Re: How does libtool decide which so to link against? Ralf Wildenhues
• libtool-2.2.10: print vs. printf Markus Duft
  • Re: libtool-2.2.10: print vs. printf Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: libtool-2.2.10: print vs. printf Markus Duft
  • Re: libtool-2.2.10: print vs. printf Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: libtool-2.2.10: print vs. printf Markus Duft
• --with-sysroot conflicts in binutils and gcc Khem Raj
  • Re: --with-sysroot conflicts in binutils and gcc Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: --with-sysroot conflicts in binutils and gcc Paolo Bonzini
  • Re: --with-sysroot conflicts in binutils and gcc Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: --with-sysroot conflicts in binutils and gcc Paolo Bonzini
  • Re: --with-sysroot conflicts in binutils and gcc Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: --with-sysroot conflicts in binutils and gcc Khem Raj
  • Re: --with-sysroot conflicts in binutils and gcc Paolo Bonzini
• undefined reference error Sergio Belkin
  • Re: undefined reference error Ralf Wildenhues
• Version mismatch error Sergio Belkin
  • Re: Version mismatch error Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: Version mismatch error Sergio Belkin
  • Re: Version mismatch error Dan Nicholson
  • Re: Version mismatch error Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: Version mismatch error Dan Nicholson
• [RFC] w32 and Libtool. Peter Rosin
  • Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool. Vincent Torri
  • Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool. Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool. Peter Rosin
  • Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool. Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool. Simon Josefsson
  • Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool. Peter Rosin
  • Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool. Simon Josefsson
  • Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool. Peter Rosin
  • Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool. Simon Josefsson
  • Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool. Peter Rosin
  • Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool. Peter Rosin
• LT_INIT pic-only not setting --with-pic Luke Mewburn
  • Re: LT_INIT pic-only not setting --with-pic Ralf Wildenhues
• Re: Linking one library against another + static vs. shared Sander Niemeijer
• Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ethan Mallove
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ingo Krabbe
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ethan Mallove
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ethan Mallove
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Robert Boehne
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ethan Mallove
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ethan Mallove
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ethan Mallove
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ethan Mallove
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ethan Mallove
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ethan A Mallove
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Peter Rosin
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ethan Mallove
  • Re: Unwanted shared runtime libraries getting added Ralf Wildenhues
• libtool and LTO Andi Kleen
  • Re: libtool and LTO Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: libtool and LTO Ralf Wildenhues
• libposix Bruce Korb
• somewhat misleading -no-undefined documentation Matěj Týč
  • Re: somewhat misleading -no-undefined documentation Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: somewhat misleading -no-undefined documentation Simon Josefsson
  • Re: somewhat misleading -no-undefined documentation Peter Rosin
• libtool 2.2.10: What is the correct library naming convention Joost Kraaijeveld
  • Re: libtool 2.2.10: What is the correct library naming convention Ralf Wildenhues
• New autobuild results for MSVC from v2.4-7-gc5bce82 Peter Rosin
• bindir.at takes forever. Peter Rosin
  • Re: bindir.at takes forever. Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: bindir.at takes forever. Dave Korn
• Inherited linker flags Sam Varshavchik
  • Re: Inherited linker flags Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: Inherited linker flags Ralf Wildenhues
• Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable], yet might not be an immediate drop in replacement for version 2.2.10 Kyle Sallee
  • Libtool 2.4 and APR (was: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable], yet might not be an immediate) drop in replacement for version 2.2.10 Ralf Wildenhues
• GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable] Gary V. Vaughan
  • Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable] Alon Bar-Lev
  • Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable] Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable] Alon Bar-Lev
  • Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable] Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable] Paolo Bonzini
  • Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable] Charles Wilson
  • Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable] Alon Bar-Lev
  • Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable] Paolo Bonzini
  • Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable] Charles Wilson
  • Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable] Alon Bar-Lev
  • Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable] Charles Wilson
• Multi lib 32 bits support t66...@gmail.com
  • Re: Multi lib 32 bits support Ralf Wildenhues
• bogus warning 'seems to be moved' Marco Atzeri
  • Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved' Dave Korn
  • Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved' Marco Atzeri
  • Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved' Charles Wilson
  • Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved' Marco Atzeri
  • Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved' Charles Wilson
  • Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved' Marco Atzeri
  • Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved' Marco Atzeri
  • Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved' Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved' Marco Atzeri
• 2.4 Release in 24hrs Gary V. Vaughan
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Gary V. Vaughan
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Gary V. Vaughan
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Gary V. Vaughan
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Gary V. Vaughan
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Charles Wilson
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Charles Wilson
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Charles Wilson
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Charles Wilson
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Peter Rosin
  • autobuild results (was: 2.4 Release in 24hrs) Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: autobuild results Peter Rosin
  • Re: autobuild results Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Charles Wilson
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Peter Rosin
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Eric Blake
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Peter Rosin
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Charles Wilson
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Gary V. Vaughan
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Charles Wilson
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Gary V. Vaughan
  • Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs Ralf Wildenhues

• Earlier messages
• Later messages