hi, > 2.2 has *much* better test coverage. Probably, 1.5x would also fail > the better tests... and more of them than 2.2!
that's a good point. thx. > > 2.2x is 'ok', but the tests are problematic? or, drop back to stable > > 15x? > > Use 2.2 given the above pt, clear. > and report any failures you see in the new improved tests to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], so that we can fix them in time for 2.2.2 next > month. already done the other day. pending ... :-) _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
