On 6 Mar 2008, at 10:29, snowcrash+libtool wrote:
as they're both 'release versions' now, if 1.5x tests are passing 100%, but 2.2x is showing numerous failures, what's the general consensus on which to use?
2.2 has *much* better test coverage. Probably, 1.5x would also fail the better tests... and more of them than 2.2!
2.2x is 'ok', but the tests are problematic? or, drop back to stable 15x?
Use 2.2 and report any failures you see in the new improved tests to[EMAIL PROTECTED], so that we can fix them in time for 2.2.2 next month.
:-)
Cheers,
Gary
--
())_. Email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( '/ Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net
/ )= ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
`(_~)_
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
