* Mike Frysinger wrote on Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 09:40:43PM CET: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 12:06:40PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote: > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > >On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 02:16:18PM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote: > > >>On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > >>>On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 06:17:10AM +0000, Paul Jakma wrote: > > >>>>I tried to upgrade to a 1.5.18 in order to see if Problem 1 had been > > >>>>addressed at all (i had been using 1.5.6 i think - perhaps with some > > >>>>m4 files from CVS circa 2004 which dont have this problem). However, > > >>>>I found that there still does not seem to be a way to suppress > > >>>>libtool's desire to check for every possible language known to > > >>>>computer science.
> > This is a more relevant post: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-08/msg00137.html Well, yes, but it also shows a workaround only, not the solution from HEAD. > that looks nice ... > > to be clear, does cvs HEAD (aka 2.0) support this feature ? there's > two things i'm after ... > - do not error out if C++ is not detected and C++ is not required Yes, works in HEAD. > - do not even include extraneous language checks (CXX/F77/GCJ) Yes, works in HEAD. > i was told the first one was fixed in cvs HEAD, but i'm not sure of > the status of the second one ... Both work, and both work without any workarounds on user side. I've looked a bit, and the solution in HEAD is a bit involved. So I myself won't invest the work to backport that, it's probably about as much work (hopefully) to fix the remaining HEAD issues.. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
