On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 12:06:40PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 02:16:18PM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
> >>On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>>On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 06:17:10AM +0000, Paul Jakma wrote:
> >>>>I tried to upgrade to a 1.5.18 in order to see if Problem 1 had been
> >>>>addressed at all (i had been using 1.5.6 i think - perhaps with some
> >>>>m4 files from CVS circa 2004 which dont have this problem). However,
> >>>>I found that there still does not seem to be a way to suppress
> >>>>libtool's desire to check for every possible language known to
> >>>>computer science.
> 
> >this thread is not about that problem
> >
> >we're complaining about libtool-1.5 even checking for those languages
> 
> This is a more relevant post:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-08/msg00137.html

that looks nice ...

to be clear, does cvs HEAD (aka 2.0) support this feature ?  there's
two things i'm after ...
- do not error out if C++ is not detected and C++ is not required
- do not even include extraneous language checks (CXX/F77/GCJ)

i was told the first one was fixed in cvs HEAD, but i'm not sure of
the status of the second one ...
-mike


_______________________________________________
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Reply via email to