I submitted a patch recently to libtool-patches to pass through
unrecognized -[arg] and +[arg] switches:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-09/msg00034.html
I just ran across a failure. It seems ok to pass through unrecognized
switches that do *not* take an argument. However, consider the IRIX
-woff option:
-woff all Suppresses warning messages. The -n32 option must also be
specified with this option.
-woff numberlist
Suppresses warning messages. numberlist is a comma-
separated set of 1 or more numbersets. A numberset is
either a simple integer or a pair of integers separated by
a hyphen. Examples: -woff 1527 suppresses warning 1527.
-woff 1527-1570 suppresses warnings 1527 through 1570.
-woff 1600-1700,1705-1790 suppresses numbers 1600 through
1700 and 1705 through 1790.
What do we do? Do we have libtool special-case command-line arguments
that take an argument or revert the patch and special-case what
command-line arguments we do recognize? I'm leaning towards the
latter as it will be easier to control.
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
