On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 12:59:43PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > > > >No, I was recommending that we keep the patches to pass through unknown > >options, since that leaves only one problematic case: unknown options with > >arguments. Before the patch *all* unknown options were stopped, and we > >would be back in that situation if we revert. > > > >Are _you_ saying you want to keep the patch? Or do you want to revert it > >too? > > ... Our #1 priority should be to ensure that the compiler still > compiles when driven by libtool. If libtool disects options and > passes parts through incorrectly then the compiler will no longer > compile. It is better to reject/ignore the entire option if it > would otherwise not be passed correctly.
Yes! -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
