On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 13:24, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: You've just woken up, haven't you? :-)
> Scott James Remnant wrote: > | On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 17:36, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > | > | > |>On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Scott James Remnant wrote: > |> > |>>I use Autoconf 2.58 and Automake 1.7 (latest Debian packages, basically) > |>>to bootstrap and it works just fine. > |> > |>The top of libtool's bootstrap script says: > |> > |># Helps bootstrapping libtool, when checked out from CVS > |># requires at least GNU autoconf 2.58 and GNU automake 1.8. > |> > |>Perhaps this comment is in error? > |> > | > | Yes, Makefile.am says: > | > | AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = 1.7 gnu > | > | > | Though, I believe, if you use 1.8 it will take advantage of the new > | include stuff? > > Yep. That's right. We could explain that in the comment in bootstrap instead > of lying... ;-) > I'll leave you to make that ObviousFix :-) I'm going to be too busy examining aclocal *glares at it ruefully* :p Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
