It seems to me that for packages which embed libtool and use libltdl,
it is very trivial for the package's configure script to also
configure libltdl.  This is *much* more efficient time-wise and
space-wise than a recursive configure.  The fact that the libtool
package uses a recursive configure sets a bad example that causes
libltdl to seem like a lot more overhead than it really needs to be.

Should we convert the libltdl configuration to be part of libtool's
main configure script?

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen



_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Reply via email to