It seems to me that for packages which embed libtool and use libltdl, it is very trivial for the package's configure script to also configure libltdl. This is *much* more efficient time-wise and space-wise than a recursive configure. The fact that the libtool package uses a recursive configure sets a bad example that causes libltdl to seem like a lot more overhead than it really needs to be.
Should we convert the libltdl configuration to be part of libtool's main configure script? Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool