Ralphs patch: <http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2003-08/msg00002.html>
A small summary explaining the rationale behind the patch: <http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2003-08/msg00008.html>
Regards, Sander
On maandag, okt 6, 2003, at 20:04 Europe/Amsterdam, Patrick Riley wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a project which I am in the process of converting to using autoconf, automake, and libtool. [1]
The project builds several libraries and executables. For one of the libraries, I would like to force libtool to only create shared libraries, not static libraries no matter what the user gives to configure (for the use being made of the library, only a shared library makes sense). The other libraries should still obey the various enable/disable shared/static directives.
Ideally, I would like to do this without having to do a recursive configure. If I do have to do a recursive configure, is it desirable/possible/how do I only have one copy of the libtool things in my distribution?
Thank you.
[1] The project is http://spades-sim.sf.net. Only the CVS version has
GNU autotool stuff because, as I said, I'm in the midst of conversion. I
also don't think the code is very portable yet, so you might have
problems if you actually try to compile it.
-- Patrick Riley Fifth Year Ph.D. Student Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~pfr
_______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
_______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
