On Feb 7, 2002, "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 05:55:27PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Feb 7, 2002, "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Well, there is no libiberty.so. You wind up with always linking files >> > in libiberty.a when libtool is used, no matter they are needed or >> > not. >> >> And what is the problem with linking libiberty.a, if libbfd actually >> depends on it?
> libbfd.so doesn't depend on libiberty.a. But libbfd.a does. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
