On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:57:57AM -0600, Robert Boehne wrote: > Alexandre: > > You have my approval to un-do my mistsake. If I had understood > exactly what this patch was doing then I would have rejected it myself. > H.J. As I now understand it, your patch doesn't improve anything, > it just breaks static linking (where you'd actually need the dependent > archive). When linking shared the archive is already pulled into the > *.so, so it isn't actually dependent on the archive. >
Well, there is no libiberty.so. You wind up with always linking files in libiberty.a when libtool is used, no matter they are needed or not. H.J. _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
