In regard to: Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Gary V....:
>On Monday 16 July 2001 4:10 pm, Robert Boehne wrote:
>> Here is the test case, if someone wants to libtoolize it, we
>> could add it to the macro.
>
>Seconded! I would happily accept a patch to perform the test *instead* of
>listing values for only hosts triplets that have been researched...
:-) For now, what do you think of the updated patch, below?
Tim
--
Tim Mooney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
diff -ur libtool-1.4b.orig/ltdl.m4 libtool-1.4b/ltdl.m4
--- libtool-1.4b.orig/ltdl.m4 Thu Jul 5 18:10:26 2001
+++ libtool-1.4b/ltdl.m4 Mon Jul 16 16:06:34 2001
@@ -70,13 +70,57 @@
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_CANONICAL_HOST])
AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether deplibs are loaded by dlopen],
libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs, [dnl
- # PORTME does your system automatically load deplibs for dlopen()?
+ # PORTME does your system automatically load deplibs for dlopen()
+ # or its logical equivalent (e.g. shl_load for HP-UX < 11)
+ # For now, we just catch OSes we know something about -- in the
+ # future, we'll try test this programmatically.
libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=unknown
case "$host_os" in
+ aix3*|aix4.1.*|aix4.2.*)
+ # Unknown whether this is true for these versions of AIX, but
+ # we want this `case' here to explicitly catch those versions.
+ libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=unknown
+ ;;
+ aix4*)
+ # Unknown whether this is true for aix5, but is true for aix >= 4.3.*
+ libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=yes
+ ;;
+ irix[12345]*|irix6.[01234]*)
+ # Catch all versions of IRIX before 6.5, and indicate that we don't
+ # know how it worked for any of those versions.
+ libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=unknown
+ ;;
+ irix*)
+ # The case above catches anything before 6.5, and it's known that
+ # at 6.5 and later dlopen does load deplibs.
+ libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=yes
+ ;;
linux*)
libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=yes
;;
netbsd*)
+ libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=yes
+ ;;
+ osf[1234]*)
+ # dlopen did load deplibs (at least at 4.x), but until the 5.x series,
+ # it did *not* use an RPATH in a shared library to find objects the
+ # library depends on, so we explictly say `no'.
+ libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=no
+ ;;
+ osf5.0|osf5.0a|osf5.1)
+ # dlopen *does* load deplibs and with the right loader patch applied
+ # it even uses RPATH in a shared library to search for shared objects
+ # that the library depends on, but there's no easy way to know if that
+ # patch is installed. Since this is the case, all we can really
+ # say is unknown -- it depends on the patch being installed. If
+ # it is, this changes to `yes'. Without it, it would be `no'.
+ libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=unknown
+ ;;
+ osf*)
+ # the two cases above should catch all versions of osf <= 5.1. Read
+ # the comments above for what we know about them.
+ # At > 5.1, deplibs are loaded *and* any RPATH in a shared library
+ # is used to find them so we can finally say `yes'.
libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=yes
;;
solaris*)
--- libtool-1.4b.orig/ChangeLog Mon Jul 9 17:02:09 2001
+++ libtool-1.4b/ChangeLog Mon Jul 16 16:10:41 2001
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+2001-07-16 Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tim Mooney
+<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * ltdl.m4 (AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS): add cases and comments for
+ more platforms, including AIX, Digital/Tru64 UNIX and IRIX.
+
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
