Christopher Knight wrote:
>
> Hi Ossama,
>
> Unfortunately we do need dlopen and dlpreopen support. We have a C++ core that
> dlopens a bunch of C++ .so modules. One main reason we switched from Imake to
> Automake is to allow us to use the dlpreopen functionality without rolling
> our own :( We are also porting to Linux)
>
> How much work is there to do on dl[pre]open? If it is partially there, then
> I would be happy to help complete the support while I merge the new libtool
> into our build process.
>
Well, dlopen almost works. It reorders the libraries, what it shouldn't do
and somehow convenient libraries don't work correctly as it reorders command
line options there as well.
If you need it, it should be fixable.
Greetings, Stephan
P.S. what does an "Assistant Vice President" do? ;-)
--
Programmers, heed this: If someone starts asking you about
agricultural genomes, it's likely time to get a handler.
zdnet.com about Torvalds
