Dnia poniedziałek, 14 lutego 2011 o 17:38:14 Peter O'Gorman napisał(a):
> This passed all tests and make distcheck, I am pretty sure that nothing
> requires ltmain to be executable, but just in case someone knows better,
> I'm asking for approval :)
>
> Ok?
>
> Peter
>
openSuSE does not approve of unstable versions; I can tentatively test the
build if I get all patches since 2.4. Could you make a cumulative diff?
Thanks,
Chris
+ echo 'Patch #2 (0001-Install-ltmain.sh-without-execute-bit-set.patch):'
Patch #2 (0001-Install-ltmain.sh-without-execute-bit-set.patch):
+ /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 --fuzz=0
+ /bin/cat
/usr/src/packages/SOURCES/0001-Install-ltmain.sh-without-execute-bit-set.patch
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ChangeLog.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hCn7vU (%prep)
== ChangeLog.rej ==
--- ChangeLog
+++ ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2011-02-12 Peter O'Gorman <pe...@pogma.com>
+
+ Install ltmain.sh without execute bit set.
+ * Makefile.am: change install rule for ltmain.sh
+ Reported by Křištof Želechovski.
+
2011-02-07 Ralf Wildenhues <ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de>
docs: fix copyright years in PDF version of the manual.
== ChangeLog ==
2010-09-22 Gary V. Vaughan <g...@gnu.org>
Release 2.4.
