* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 05:24:05PM CEST: > On 22 Aug 2010, at 22:09, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > # consider using shallow clones here, to ease server load. > > git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/autoconf.git > > git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/automake.git > > We could pull the already bootstrapped release tarballs from an > ftp.gnu.org mirror here instead. Sure. > > git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/libtool.git > > Of course, that doesn't test the patch series you haven't > pushed yet... Just add 'git checkout origin/parallel-tests'. > And running it as an Autotest inside the existing tree would > get us better coverage, and obviate the need for a separate > checkout of the libtool tree entirely. Sure. But look at the existing sort-of-recursive tests. They are tricky. I am waiting for the day where we add infinite recursion in some corner case and have developers complain. The net is abundant now, I think such test helper scripts are a real easy way to get more coverage, but I don't think it is necessary to run them as part of each testsuite run, because they are very expensive. > > # Now, mail all output and logs to the autobuild site ... > > # ... and consider cleaning up afterwards. > > The last bit of the script is missing ;) TBD when I have all the autobuild setup figured out and all. Cheers, Ralf