Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 05:18:55AM CEST: > On 06/13/2010 12:07 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 06:07:44AM CEST: [ the resident test ] > >>I'm not sure what testing that modules cannot be unloaded gets you > >>when you don't have shared libraries. > > > >That may be true, but the failure was during lt_dlopen. I think it > >should be possible to preload modules with the resident bit, no? I > >mean, they are the prototype of resident modules, their closing is what > >won't do the right thing for non-residents (and maybe a future > >improvement of the preopen loader could even emulate that). > > > >This failure looks like a genuine ltdl bug to me; why not leave it open > >for now?
> IIRC this one could also be fixed by using > LTDL_SET_PRELOADED_SYMBOLS, I don't remember for sure, but I recall > being convinced that these were all testsuite issues. Well, if that fixes it, then that is fine with me of course. Thanks! Ralf
