On 09/11/2013 07:28 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:54:58PM +0200, bjoern wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:04:01PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 09/09/13 10:38, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Actually, it could make sense to document the API available in each
version, that is, have something like:
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/3.3/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/3.6/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/4.0/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/4.1/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/4.2/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/current/idl/
Well, properly packaged versions come with their own api-docs, so
IMHO no need to keep docs for unsupported releases around.
Packaged docs are much less practical for the user.
I always love it how <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/> (linked as
"Documentation: Manual" from the GCC homepage <http://gcc.gnu.org/>)
unambiguously makes available the documentation for each released GCC
major.minor version. Could serve as a model for us.
Stephan
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
