On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:54:58PM +0200, bjoern wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:04:01PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: >> On 09/09/13 10:38, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> Actually, it could make sense to document the API available in each >>> version, that is, have something like: >>> http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/3.3/idl/ >>> http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/3.6/idl/ >>> http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/4.0/idl/ >>> http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/4.1/idl/ >>> http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/4.2/idl/ >>> http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/current/idl/ > Well, properly packaged versions come with their own api-docs, so > IMHO no need to keep docs for unsupported releases around. Packaged docs are much less practical for the user. 1) Need to install the old "packaged version" (or at least its SDK) to check e.g. backwards compatibility. Much easier to quickly check online. 2) Online docs are automatically indexed (DuckDuckGo, Google, Bing, ...), searchable, a general Internet search finds them, ... -- Lionel _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
