On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:51:11PM -0600, Adolfo Jayme Barrientos wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> wrote: > > Becaudse *you* don't care about what "Open Source" is doesn't mean that all > > the > > people who care should do stuff to clean it up. > > Hello, Rene Engelhard. It is the first time you and I talk to each > other, and we had never met face-to-face. Is this the way you talk to > people, assuming things like “you don’t care”? This says a lot from > you, and if you want to know: I do care, if I didn’t, I wouldn’t spend > so much of my free time contributing to LibreOffice.
Yes, we never met, but from your last post it *seems* you don't care, as you say LO should include the non-fee font and Debian should remove it. If you cared about OSS you would defend a software containing only that and would reject non-free fonts outright. > Now, going on-topic: the UFL does not forbid LibreOffice from > including Ubuntu [1], we are not renaming it, and honestly, calling it Not allowing to rename it fails the DFSG/Open Source Definition. > as endorsing the distro? Even if it did, that would be a benefit to > Debian, come on! Rene Engelhard, let’s not make this a discussion on How? Regards, Rene _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
