On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Adolfo Jayme Barrientos <fitosch...@gmail.com> wrote: > Now, going on-topic: the UFL does not forbid LibreOffice from > including Ubuntu [1], we are not renaming it, and honestly, calling it > “distro-specific” based on just the name, is throwing bullshit. There > is a cola beverage named Ubuntu, and it is not affiliated with > Canonical, why including the fonts in LibreOffice would be interpreted > as endorsing the distro?
If the name was so inconsequential, why did the author choose a license that forbid _changing_ the name ? It is one thing to get distros to cooperate together one large project like libreoffice, it is quite another to purposefully try to piss-off their respective Marketing Dept. Norbert (who is not working for any distro, but can imagine why they would find that irritating) _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
