Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Based on the discussion on the IRC, I've used 'lo::' in the patch,
> instead of the too generic 'api::'.
>
For the record, I don't like lo. First, it is redundant
("LibreOffice, well sure, I knew what I was git-cloning!!1!"),
second, it is too close to this colloquial English label for the
dumping place ... ;)Cheers, -- Thorsten
pgpF5kkSn3zVX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
