drawinglayer/qa/unit/vclpixelprocessor2d.cxx | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 36eeb7a93174d17b08213eef7344952ae8e2e62e
Author: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelm...@gelma.net>
AuthorDate: Mon May 15 23:41:35 2023 +0200
Commit: Julien Nabet <serval2...@yahoo.fr>
CommitDate: Tue May 16 09:48:10 2023 +0200
Fix typo
Change-Id: I006c882aacf316dda0ecb3302835ca021d45ecc3
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/151812
Tested-by: Julien Nabet <serval2...@yahoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Julien Nabet <serval2...@yahoo.fr>
diff --git a/drawinglayer/qa/unit/vclpixelprocessor2d.cxx
b/drawinglayer/qa/unit/vclpixelprocessor2d.cxx
index 07b68c9eaad7..4362d3e55f19 100644
--- a/drawinglayer/qa/unit/vclpixelprocessor2d.cxx
+++ b/drawinglayer/qa/unit/vclpixelprocessor2d.cxx
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ public:
// that parameter was originally added. Other hints are: It is *not*
named
// 'ClipRange'. Using a B2DRange to define a ClipRange topology would
be bad due
// to not being transformable, a PolyPolygon would be used in that
case. Using as
- // clipping mechanism would offer a 2nd pinciple to add clipping for
primitives
+ // clipping mechanism would offer a 2nd principle to add clipping for
primitives
// besides MaskPrimitive2D - always bad style in a sub-system. A quick
look
// on it's usages gives hints, too.
// This means that when defining an outputRange that resides
completely *inside*
