> IMHO the decision to render just squares prolly complicates the > situation un-necessarily.
Sure, but on the other hand it makes it simpler in that we don't need to figure out the aspect ratio of each page (they can be different) beforehand. BTW, I didn't mention in the IDL, but I did think that the not only would it be a square, but also the side of the square would be a power-of-two. Presumably you also want power-of-two for each side? > Consider an A4 document - 2 x sqrt(2) in > dimensions - almost certainly we end up with some 21x17 type ratio and > then have to work hard to try to pack squares into it. Hmm, but isn't this then an argument *in favour* of keeping the rendered area square (and with a power-of-two side)? (Note that this would mean that when zoomed in at some level and beyond, some tiles will be completely outside of the page area.) --tml _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
