sw/source/uibase/wrtsh/wrtsh1.cxx | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit f306d601a1eab561815a0a1e6dc2cd3d857d4f05
Author: Justin Luth <jl...@mail.com>
AuthorDate: Mon Aug 1 15:10:40 2022 -0400
Commit: Justin Luth <jl...@mail.com>
CommitDate: Mon Aug 1 22:53:17 2022 +0200
related tdf#150197: SwWrtShell::NumOrBulletOn should SetListFormat
sw code should all use the ne ListFormat behaviour instead of
the legacy Prefix/Suffix numbering format.
There is another case in sd - but I'm a little leery
about whether SD really supports the new ListFormat for numbering...
Change-Id: I8dc0e14f5bc24d448a2551dba70b3dcce18273b0
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/137682
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Justin Luth <jl...@mail.com>
diff --git a/sw/source/uibase/wrtsh/wrtsh1.cxx
b/sw/source/uibase/wrtsh/wrtsh1.cxx
index 2e885ef49c39..d5b04b087fc2 100644
--- a/sw/source/uibase/wrtsh/wrtsh1.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/uibase/wrtsh/wrtsh1.cxx
@@ -1511,8 +1511,7 @@ void SwWrtShell::NumOrBulletOn(bool bNum)
aFormat.SetBulletChar(
numfunc::GetBulletChar(static_cast<sal_uInt8>(nLevel)));
aFormat.SetNumberingType(SVX_NUM_CHAR_SPECIAL);
// #i93908# clear suffix for bullet lists
- aFormat.SetPrefix(OUString());
- aFormat.SetSuffix(OUString());
+ aFormat.SetListFormat("", "", nLevel);
}
aNumRule.Set(o3tl::narrowing<sal_uInt16>(nLevel), aFormat);
}
@@ -1570,8 +1569,7 @@ void SwWrtShell::NumOrBulletOn(bool bNum)
aFormat.SetBulletChar( numfunc::GetBulletChar(nLvl) );
aFormat.SetNumberingType(SVX_NUM_CHAR_SPECIAL);
// #i93908# clear suffix for bullet lists
- aFormat.SetPrefix(OUString());
- aFormat.SetSuffix(OUString());
+ aFormat.SetListFormat("", "", nLvl);
}
// #i95907#
