On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 04:30:28AM -0700, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:27 AM, David Tardon <dtar...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Yes, and I plan to do that for the three of my branches. But > > feature/gbuild_testtools is not a big change, compared to the others, is > > based on pretty recent master (testtools does not change much anyway), > > so I would allow it to go directly to master. But I will listen to > > counterarguments, e.g., it is possible people (especially those not > > using Linux/x86_64) do not have the time or processing power to test > > more than one branch. That would be a good reason for merging all the > > pending conversions onto one branch. > > That was my angle indeed... especially for windows were any > out-of-band testing is a multiple hours operation, that do require so > manual attention. > So, as much as I want to test it _before_ we get to master, doing it > for 5 or 6 individual branch is a bit much
Okay, I understand that. I hope the other David will understand too, as he appears quite eager to merge right now :-) D. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice