On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 02:37:30AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:52 AM, David Ostrovsky <david.ostrov...@gmx.de> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > with help of David T. Stephan and Matúš this branch can be merged to master. > > It would be really nice, if some of you with win & mac could test it. > > If we do not hear anything withing 2 days we would merge it to master anyway > > ;-) > > As I mentionned to dtardon earlier, > due to the number of such gebuild feature branch (half a dozen or so), > it would be nice to merge them all on a 'meta' feature branch where > merge conflict, and otehr kink can be ironed-out and tested and all > platforms.. and _then_ get it to master.
Yes, and I plan to do that for the three of my branches. But feature/gbuild_testtools is not a big change, compared to the others, is based on pretty recent master (testtools does not change much anyway), so I would allow it to go directly to master. But I will listen to counterarguments, e.g., it is possible people (especially those not using Linux/x86_64) do not have the time or processing power to test more than one branch. That would be a good reason for merging all the pending conversions onto one branch. D. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
