Hi Italo, Italo Vignoli píše v Čt 03. 05. 2012 v 12:09 +0200:
> Actually, the wiki I have been pointed to by Regina is the OOo > documentation wiki, which is a useful reference but not LO Help Wiki. > > The links are the following: > > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/How_Tos/Calc:_Functions_listed_by_category > > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/How_Tos/Calc:_Functions_listed_alphabetically > > If you send me the links to LO Help Wiki, I can dig further to check if > there are other problems. I feel that the situation of the help is a > huge mess anyway, because of inconsistencies between sources. > > If LO Help Wiki is a conversion of the help files, the inconsistencies > apply, and the information are missing. I see, sorry for the misunderstanding. Yes, LO wikihelp is a conversion of the help files, so as such, the inconsistencies apply the same way as for the 'plain' LO help. > For instance, on OOo documentation wiki all functions have a "see also" > section, which in the help files is there (sometimes partially) but > hidden as a <comment>. > > I would like to improve help files by reducing inconsistencies and > adding missing contents which are available elsewhere (documentation), > or making hidden contents visible, but I feel that - given the help > structure, which is rather weird - it would be impossible to get to a > satisfactory stage (but to my eyes an improved help is better than a bad > help). That's great, thank you so much for working on that - whatever improvement in the area of Help is much appreciated! All the best, Kendy _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
