Actually, the wiki I have been pointed to by Regina is the OOo documentation wiki, which is a useful reference but not LO Help Wiki.
The links are the following: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/How_Tos/Calc:_Functions_listed_by_category http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/How_Tos/Calc:_Functions_listed_alphabetically If you send me the links to LO Help Wiki, I can dig further to check if there are other problems. I feel that the situation of the help is a huge mess anyway, because of inconsistencies between sources. If LO Help Wiki is a conversion of the help files, the inconsistencies apply, and the information are missing. For instance, on OOo documentation wiki all functions have a "see also" section, which in the help files is there (sometimes partially) but hidden as a <comment>. I would like to improve help files by reducing inconsistencies and adding missing contents which are available elsewhere (documentation), or making hidden contents visible, but I feel that - given the help structure, which is rather weird - it would be impossible to get to a satisfactory stage (but to my eyes an improved help is better than a bad help). Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Sorry to hear that - it must be a problem in the help -> wikihelp > converter. Can you please give me an example URL of the wikihelp page > where there is a missing information? -- Italo Vignoli - it...@italovignoli.com mob +39.348.5653829 - VoIP 5316...@messagenet.it skype italovignoli - gtalk italo.vign...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
