On Wednesday 18 of April 2012, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 06:09:06PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > Does somebody see a problem with this? > > What should this possibly solve? This thread is a quite bit ADHD to me > pouring in way too many different topic in one thread.
This: On Monday 16 of April 2012, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > 2012/4/16 Lubos Lunak <l.lu...@suse.cz>: > > On Monday 16 of April 2012, Michael Meeks wrote: > >> Oh - and finally (Lubos) I pushed an item to the ESC agenda to > >> discuss whether we should be exposing tons of classes and their symbols > >> in the product, just to make unit tests work :-) > > > > I assume this is about 69d46dd7a6adfffd71da055bb65108c80d27395f . ... > I was really annoyed by the fact that is was changed without at least > asking and noticing the people who are affected by this change. There > were good reasons to have the old behaviour and I spend some ours > searching for a bug because I had to export a method for ucalc. IMHO > such basic things should not be changed without noticing and > discussing with the people who are directly working in that area. -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
