On Tuesday 17 of April 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 04/16/2012 06:23 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > On Monday 16 of April 2012, Michael Meeks wrote: > >> Oh - and finally (Lubos) I pushed an item to the ESC agenda to discuss > >> whether we should be exposing tons of classes and their symbols in the > >> product, just to make unit tests work :-) > > > > I assume this is about 69d46dd7a6adfffd71da055bb65108c80d27395f . > > Would it be possible to replace gb_CppunitTest_add_library_objects with > something that explicitly lists (only) the individual objects from the > given library that should be linked into the test?
I doubt that would work with an application, where presumably everything is eventually used by everything else. But maybe gbuild could be changed to include target-specific LDFLAGS? That way it'd be possible to build as 'make sc_ucalc_LDFLAGS=-Wl,--strip-all' . Probably even Bjoern's --enable-debug extension can do. -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
