On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Winfried Donkers <w.donk...@dci-electronics.nl> wrote: >> From: Norbert Thiebaud [mailto:nthieb...@gmail.com] >> Sent: maandag 27 februari 2012 08:26 >> ... >> yes, but the mix of various changes leading to such a big patch and >> especially the removal of entry peppered in the middle of a massive >> re-formating makes that, even with some diff + sed magic, I cannot >> reduce that to something readable, so I cannot review it. >> >> In order for _me_ to sign-off for 3.5 branch, I would need you to >> break your patch along the lines discussed earlier... > > I have done some editing with vi > -remove all leading spaces (:%s/ \{1,\}//g); > -insert linefeed between '><' (:%s/></>\r</g); > -remove empty lines (:%s/\n\{2,\}/\r/g) > on both the Labels.xcu from before and after my commit. > > I made a diff file (diff -a -b), which now shows only changes in contents. > The diff file is still 7448 lines long as all 1700+ definitions have been > changed. > > Will this help you to review the patch for pushing to 3.5 branch?
Is the result an applicable patch ? if so, sure send it I'll have a look Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
