> From: Norbert Thiebaud [mailto:nthieb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: maandag 27 februari 2012 08:26
> ...
> yes, but the mix of various changes leading to such a big patch and
> especially the removal of entry peppered in the middle of a massive
> re-formating makes that, even with some diff + sed magic, I cannot
> reduce that to something readable, so I cannot review it.
> 
> In order for _me_ to sign-off for 3.5 branch, I would need you to
> break your patch along the lines discussed earlier...

I have done some editing with vi
-remove all leading spaces (:%s/ \{1,\}//g);
-insert linefeed between '><' (:%s/></>\r</g);
-remove empty lines (:%s/\n\{2,\}/\r/g)
on both the Labels.xcu from before and after my commit.

I made a diff file (diff -a -b), which now shows only changes in contents. The 
diff file is still 7448 lines long as all 1700+ definitions have been changed.

Will this help you to review the patch for pushing to 3.5 branch?
(Just yesterday an (duplicate) bug was reported for this patch)

Winfried
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to