> I must say, of all the options so far, that one sound the most appealing to > me. > and it can be done 'incrementally', one module at the time...
One could do the thing I suggested incrementally, too. > While we are at it, why not have just one public header file per > module... But isn't this "module" terminology mostly wishful thinking in many cases? I.e. some "modules" contain stuff that are not really related much at all from a functionality point of view, and in other cases stuff that one would imagine belongs together has been split into several "modules" for obscure and/or obsolete reasons. --tml _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
