On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:39:25PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 21/02/12 11:59, Michael Meeks wrote: > would need to try that out on Windows, but my guess is that even if it > doesn't blow out command line length limits (which could be worked > around with a response file) it'll make the Windows build a lot slower > because compiler has to try out all include paths (well statistically > half of them but that is bad enough) for every included files, and those > file accesses take forever on Windows.
^^ This! IIRC, Mathias Bauer benchmarked that once and noted that on Windows each added path has a significant impact on buildtime, so you really dont what to go laissez-faire with those. Also the order of -I-switches can be quite important. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
