On 07.02.2018 11:46, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:57:46AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 07.02.2018 09:33, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
commit bf23fe3a4a3eebe3d08fa26341a486b83d80c1c7
Author: Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Feb 7 09:11:35 2018 +0100

      Fix CustomTarget_postprocess/check_dynamic_objects for --enable-qt5
      The dependency of Library_vcl on qt5 libraries (via vcl/qt5/Qt5Font.cxx) 
is
      there ever since b66a7cbd8491fe436126e11975c360f47ae346ed "QT5 first stab 
on
      implementing CommonSalLayout", but no idea whether that is by design or 
is a
      hack that should eventually be cleaned up.

Any thoughts on the above?  It might e.g. by undesirable for distros that do
--enable-qt5 but split libvclplug_qt5lo.so into a Qt5-dependent package of
its own (and don't want the base vcl package to depend on Qt5).

Yes, I already "complained" about this, jmux had a look/wanted to have
a look. This is a blocker for me enabling qt5. I am so not making -core
depending on qt5.

So whoever will eventually fix that, please remember to revert the relevant part of this bf23fe3a4a3eebe3d08fa26341a486b83d80c1c7, too.
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to