Hi, On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:57:46AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 07.02.2018 09:33, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > commit bf23fe3a4a3eebe3d08fa26341a486b83d80c1c7 > > Author: Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> > > Date: Wed Feb 7 09:11:35 2018 +0100 > > > > Fix CustomTarget_postprocess/check_dynamic_objects for --enable-qt5 > > The dependency of Library_vcl on qt5 libraries (via > > vcl/qt5/Qt5Font.cxx) is > > there ever since b66a7cbd8491fe436126e11975c360f47ae346ed "QT5 first > > stab on > > implementing CommonSalLayout", but no idea whether that is by design > > or is a > > hack that should eventually be cleaned up. > > Any thoughts on the above? It might e.g. by undesirable for distros that do > --enable-qt5 but split libvclplug_qt5lo.so into a Qt5-dependent package of > its own (and don't want the base vcl package to depend on Qt5).
Yes, I already "complained" about this, jmux had a look/wanted to have a look. This is a blocker for me enabling qt5. I am so not making -core depending on qt5. (Or I unmerge it and do some dpkg-divert hacks. That is awful and error-prone, though and doesn't scale...) Regards, Rene _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice