Reverted. https://github.com/hunspell/hunspell/commit/58dfe79637982c5c49658c57c3b01d4f44c07c19 I guess everybody should be happy now. Life goes on. I won't touch version 1 code any more.
On 17.11.2017 15:21, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > But not Apache, for example. > Can you explain how is this? LGPL library can be linked dynamically to any application with "incompatible" license (not sure if that was the wording). On 17.11.2017 16:23, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > With LibreOffice being one of the major downstream consumers of > hunspell, we are concerned about this - so_if_ you're pondering to > reduce the number of licenses (which at any rate should be agreed on > amicably between the project maintainers), why not pick the MPL > instead? I will see at later stages if LGPLv3/MPLv2 is a good option, for V2. On 17.11.2017 16:54, Caolán McNamara wrote: > Why not add hunspell2 (or junspell) as a new work in a new repository > at that higher level, move src/hunspell2 from hunspell to the new repo > and copy whatever shared stuff is needed. Restore the old license stuff > for the classic hunspell repository and work away on the successor in > the separate repo under the hunspell umbrella. I will see later. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
