On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 06:03:30PM +0000, Димитриј Мијоски wrote: > I don't see any copyright infringement, as Hunspell allowed LGPLv2.1 or > later, which safely allows us to put out derivative work to LGPLv3. And > also, ALL copyright notices were kept.
But you didn't ask the copyrigh holders. > As for the license, I really don't see what is the problem with LGPLv3. It > is a very open license which allows the library to be used pretty much > everywhere, including application with more stricter licenses like GPL and > proprietary licenses, and in more liberal licenses like BSD and MIT. But not Apache, for example. > Again, the library is in good hands. If you want I can even show you my > computer science degree with the grades. That does prove what? Regards, Rene _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice