On 11/10/2011 05:14 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 18:05 -0500, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I assume that this would check for an array as well.
I would feel safer if pointers were set to NULL (or nullptr if we
support C++11) since it is not safe to delete a pointer twice.
?, convert all delete to e.g. DELETEZ, i.e. delete foo, foo = NULL ?
Wouldn't be a fan of that, c++ is the language that it is, need to live
with that and not try and make it something that it isn't.
Setting a pointer to NULL after deleting the contents of the pointer is
safe so that if you go to delete it again it is not a problem.
Sorry, I do not understand your reply with respect to trying to make C++
something that it is not.... and I would really like to understand.
--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
