On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 18:05 -0500, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: > I assume that this would check for an array as well. > > I would feel safer if pointers were set to NULL (or nullptr if we > support C++11) since it is not safe to delete a pointer twice.
?, convert all delete to e.g. DELETEZ, i.e. delete foo, foo = NULL ? Wouldn't be a fan of that, c++ is the language that it is, need to live with that and not try and make it something that it isn't. C. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
