> but currently LO doesn't seem to use it (couldn't find -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG); why > is that?
We tried, but we ran into so many problems when code compiled with that without that were mixed (accidentally/unintentionally) that we gave up. Caolán knows more. See commit d1f6403c9ee3caf6b2e6babe5eb6b2ff62feaa9d and the history of the stuff it touches. (I must say I am a bit disappointed at the GNU C++ library here: this thing that you can't mix code compiled with and without that define, and don't even get any linkage error if you do anyway, doesn't sound very elegant; in fact it sounds like something people would laugh at Microsoft for doing... But of course I am mostly clueless about the details, there might be good reasons why doing it otherwise would be a bad idea.) --tml _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice