Thanks for the translations, and thanks for pushing! A few notes:

>  /*-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -    Beschreibung: Uebernahme der aktualisierten Werte aus dem Set
> +    Description: acquisition of the updates values from the set
>   -----------------------------------------------------------------------*/

I think that while editing comments like these we want to cut down the 
excessive ASCII graphics, too. Or do we? Also, the word "Description:" here is 
pointless, what else are comments if not descriptive?

I am not sure if there is any consensus here, but personally, if I edit a 
comment that is formatted like that, at the same time I drop the ASCII graphics 
and end up with simply:

// Acquisition of the updates values from the set

Thus saving two lines of vertical space, a very scarce resource.

> +        // Orientation and Size from PageItem
> +        // set left and right border
> +    // evaluate header-attributes

Just nitpicking, but do try to avoid German capitalization of Nouns and overuse 
of hyphenized-words. Use consistent capitalization of the first word of a 
comment that isn't a complete sentence, either always just lower case or always 
initial capital. (Comments that are one or several complete sentences should 
always be properly capitalized.)

>  // PRIVATE METHODES ------------------------------------------------------
>  /*------------------------------------------------------------------------

More ASCII graphics that can be removed, and the " PRIVATE METHODES" should 
either be lowercased and its spelling corrected (no e in methods). Or just 
dropped, why would this source file need such a comment telling that private 
methods follow? Is it even true?

> +    Description: ctor
> +    Description:  static data
> +    Description:     Now as TabPage
> + Description:        Initialisation

Fairly useless comments.  I would just remove them. Constructors are 
recognizable by their signature, static data is also obvious, "Now as TabPage" 
doesn't really tell much without knowledge of the history of the code anyway, 
and it is very obvious that a method called "Init" does initialisation.

--tml


_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to