On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:36:27PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > The main thing that I changed was that in some cases you used > vector<...>::iterator it = another_iterator + 1; This is not correct, > operator+() is not defined on std::vector, so the result might be not > what you'd expect; similarly with -1. I have changed those to ++it, or > --it (on a temporary copy, or so).
Hi, Kendy, sure it is defined, see ISO C++, 24.1.5, table 76: Random access iterator requirements. ISO C++, 23.1.1, table 68 even describes operational semantics of operator[] for vector and deque by *(a.begin() + n) :) D. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
