On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 22:04 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > Hello hackers, > > I would like to make the --suppress-license option of unopkg skip the > license in all cases instead of depending on what is in the extension's > description.xml //simple-licen...@suppress-if-required]. > > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/Description_of_XML_Elements#Element_.2Fdescription.2Fregistration.2Fsimple-license > > According to this wiki page, this feature has been introduced in OOo > 3.3... which isn't released yet. > > Do you have any strong opinion against that? I would need this kind of > unconditional skip to run unopkg from within ooeclipse... where people > should develop their extensions and know the license ;)
IMO the principle of lease surprise dictates that, when given --suppress-license, it should suppress license unconditionally no matter what some file in undisclosed location has in it. So, I'm with you on that. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc <kyosh...@novell.com> _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
